Skip to Content Top
What Is an Example of a Motion for Summary Judgment?

What is a Practical Example of a Motion for Summary Judgment?

Melvin Gibbs: Motion for Summary Judgment

Melvin Gibbs is a structural engineer and local musician who lives in the Wicker Park neighborhood of Chicago, Illinois. Melvin and his attorneys have been fighting his foreclosure case since early 2010. When the case was first filed, First Fidelity National Lending Association was the plaintiff. Attached to the complaint were a mortgage and note made in favor of Internet Lending Corp, Inc. The note and mortgage were not indorsed and there was no assignment of mortgage on file. After Melvin's attorneys issued their discovery requests, First Fidelity's attorneys filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint named National Country Servicing as the plaintiff. Attached to the amended complaint were the same copies of the mortgage and note that had been attached to the initial complaint.

Five months later, National Country Servicing's attorneys responded to Melvin's discovery requests. In their responses to Melvin's discovery requests, the bank's attorneys included the same copies of the mortgage and note that had been attached to both complaints. The bank refused to make the original mortgage and note available for viewing by Melvin's attorneys. After a lengthy battle in court, the judge ordered the bank to produce the original documents.

When Melvin's attorneys viewed the original mortgage and note, there was a major difference between the original documents produced outside of court and the copies that had been produced with National Country's complaint. The original documents included a blank indorsement signed by the now infamous Linda Green, Vice President of Internet Lending Corp, Inc. Melvin's attorneys filed a motion for summary judgment against National Country Servicing based on the bank's lack of standing to bring the lawsuit.

The bank argued that since it was in possession of a blank indorsed original note, it was the lawful holder of the note and had standing to sue. Melvin's attorneys argued that while the bank was currently in possession of a blank indorsed original note, there was no question of material fact that the bank was not in possession of the same document when the lawsuit was filed. After all, had the indorsed note been in the bank's hands when the lawsuit was filed, a copy of the indorsed note would have been attached to the original complaint. After both sides had submitted briefs supporting their positions, the court heard oral arguments on Melvin's motion for summary judgment. The court found in Melvin's favor and entered summary judgment against the bank. Shortly thereafter, Melvin was offered a permanent loan modification. Melvin accepted the permanent loan modification and achieved his goal.

Hear From Our Happy Clients

Reviews & Testimonials

At Atlas Consumer Law, your satisfaction is our priority! See for yourself what our clients have to say about working with us.

    I was so stressed out, found Atlas Consumer Law & gave them a call!

    I had absolutely NO exceptions going forward with my lawsuit against a company that harassed me for payment! I was at the ...

    Pam S.

    So Helpful & Responsive!

    Everyone at Atlas was so willing to help and so responsive. I'm so grateful for the work they put in on my case! Would highly ...

    Stephanie M.

    Results Fast!


    Jake B.

    Can Do Attitude All the Way!

    Atlas consumer Law is amazing and they have the CAN DO attitude and will do anything to get the job done.. I highly recommend ...

    Donnie P.

    Thank you for educating me about my rights as a consumer!

    The Atlas Consumer Law Group is Awesome. They promptly took care of my issue with a creditor who tried to ignore my rights as ...

    Belinda W.

    Absolutely Amazing!

    I am absolutely AMAZED at this law group! I started a case in March and got it solved in early May! The debt collector was ...

    Aline G.

    Atlas Consumer Law Goes Above & Beyond!

    Atlas helped us within 6 months more or less and they were an awesome team. I would definitely recommend Atlas Consumer Law ...

    Llyod G.

    Atlas Consumer Law is on Your Side!

    When you need the law on you side call Atlas!

    Arlene B.

Why Choose Atlas Consumer Law?

  • Secured a Fresh Start to Thousands of Consumers
  • Assisted Thousands with Errors on their Credit Reports
  • Secured Millions of Dollars in Recovery for Our Clients
  • Eliminated Over A Billion Dollars of Debt for Our Clients

Contact Atlas Consumer Law Today!

Talk to the leading law firm in the country about your rights for free! Fill out the form below or give us a call at (312) 313-1613 and we would be happy to give you the answers you need to make informed decisions for yourself and your family.

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting your information or contacting Sulaiman Law Group, Ltd., and/or Atlas Consumer Law ("the firms"), you consent to receive automated communications, including autodialed calls, pre-recorded messages, texts, and emails from the firms, their agents, assignees, affiliates, or any affiliated parties. This consent applies to all contact details you provide, as well as to future communication technologies. Using the internet or other methods to communicate with the firms does not establish an attorney-client relationship; therefore, avoid sharing confidential information through these channels. Please note that all calls may be recorded for quality assurance and training purposes. To opt-out of communications, reply with "STOP" to any text message, click the "unsubscribe" link in any email, or send a written request to the firm's mailing address. Your continued interaction with the firms signifies your acceptance of these terms. You agree to indemnify the firms against any claims arising from the use of these communication methods. The firms are not liable for any communication failures. Disputes arising under this agreement are governed by Illinois law, with jurisdiction exclusively in the courts of DuPage County, Illinois, or the nearest federal district court. These terms are subject to change, and your continued communication with the firms implies your agreement to any such changes. If any part of this agreement is found invalid, the remaining sections will remain effective. This agreement is in compliance with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and applicable state laws.